USPAP 2008–2009
|
In developing real property appraisal consulting
assignment results, an appraiser must: |
||
|
(a) |
identify the client and other intended
users;(note49) |
|
|
(b) |
identify the intended use of the appraisal
consulting assignment results;(note50)
|
|
|
(c) |
identify: |
|
|
|
(i) |
the analysis, recommendation or opinion to be developed; and
|
|
|
(ii) |
the type and definition of value developed in the appraisal(s) that is a necessary component of an analysis supporting the appraisal consulting assignment results;
|
|
|
|
Comment: If the applicable type and definition of value is market value, ascertain whether that value is to be the most probable price:
|
|
(d) |
identify the effective
date of the appraisal consulting assignment results;(note51) |
|
|
(e) |
identify the physical, legal,
and economic characteristics of the property, properties, property type(s),
or market area that are relevant(note52)
to: |
|
|
|
(i) |
the analysis, recommendation or opinion to be developed in the appraisal consulting assignment; and
|
|
|
(ii) |
an opinion of value that is a necessary component of an analysis supporting the appraisal consulting assignment results;
|
|
(f) |
identify any extraordinary assumptions necessary in the appraisal consulting assignment and in developing the opinion(s) of value necessary to support the appraisal consulting assignment results;
|
|
|
|
|
Comment: An extraordinary assumption may be used in an assignment only if:
|
|
(g) |
identify any hypothetical conditions necessary in the appraisal consulting assignment and in developing the opinion(s) of value necessary to support the appraisal consulting assignment results; and
|
|
|
|
Comment: A hypothetical condition may be used in an assignment only if:
|
|
|
(h) |
determine the scope of work necessary to produce credible assignment results in accordance with the SCOPE OF WORK RULE,(note53) including:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
the appraisal consulting methods and techniques to be employed, and
|
|
|
(ii) |
the research and analysis required to:
|
|
|
Comment: An appraiser must ensure that any opinion of value used in an appraisal consulting assignment was developed in compliance with STANDARD 1.
If an opinion of value used in a real property appraisal consulting assignment is from a source other than the consulting appraiser, the assignment may include a review, prepared in compliance with STANDARD 3, of that appraisal. Alternatively, the appraiser may accept an appraisal from another source using an extraordinary assumption in the appraisal consulting assignment, provided that all conditions necessary to use such an extraordinary assumption are fulfilled.
If the opinion of value is from an appraisal developed by the appraiser performing the real property appraisal consulting assignment, the appraiser must complete the steps set forth in STANDARD 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
USPAP 2008–2009 Edition
©The Appraisal Foundation