FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
38. Disclosure of the client in a prior ASSIGNMENT
|
Question: |
As a condition of engagement, I have been asked to disclose the name of the client for any prior appraisals I have completed on the subject property. Is making this disclosure a violation of USPAP?
|
|
|
Response: |
A definitive answer cannot be provided without examining the circumstances.
|
|
|
|
The Confidentiality section of the ETHICS RULE states, in part:
|
|
|
|
|
An appraiser must protect the confidential nature of the appraiser-client relationship.
|
|
|
There are some situations in which the appraiser cannot disclose the name of a prior client and still protect the confidential nature of the appraiser-client relationship:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An appraiser who is asked to identify the client in a prior assignment may be able to protect the confidential nature of the appraiser-client relationship by identifying the client by type rather than name. Identifying the client by type describes the client with a generalization (for example: financial institution or accountant). However, there may be circumstances in which disclosing the identity of the client by type would actually disclose the name of the client (for example: property owner, trustee). In such a case, naming the client “by type” would not be a solution.
|
|
|
|
If disclosure of the client’s identity is a condition of a potential new assignment, and the appraiser cannot disclose the client’s identity and still protect the confidential nature of the appraiser-client relationship, then the appraiser must turn down the new assignment.
|
|
|
|
An appraiser must consider the circumstances when forming a response to a request to disclose the name of the client from a prior assignment. |
|
USPAP 2008–2009 Edition
©The Appraisal Foundation